So the Internet is blowing up because a woman who is only famous because of her sex tape (Kim Kardashian) decided to get naked for a magazine. The magazine had the goal of “breaking the Internet.”

Besides the immaturity, does anyone find it ironic that an archaic medium (print media) thought it could create a lot of buzz using a new medium with naked pictures of a woman who leaked her own explicit video years ago?

Huh?

I’m tempted to leave social media altogether. I won’t have anything to write about her, anymore, but my newsfeed and timeline won’t be bombarded with explicit images. Besides the fact Kardashian’s pics are NSFW (not safe for work), they aren’t safe for healthy views of women either.

Real women are not airbrushed and touched up. I’m glad my soon-to-be wife does not match these magazine cover whores. She’s real with imperfections, and that’s just how I want her.